Emma Peel's own words, from yesterday.
FYI, I didn't even know who Tig was until you came along and I don't happen to like her brand of humour. I don't support her in any way. YOU attacked me and I responded. That is what brought what I said about. Don't try to make it seem like I somehow said this out of the blue. I've known if for a long time and so have lots of other people on OS. We all have Google ya know. Most of us choose not to say it out of some misguided belief that you will eventually let this go and re-start your life.
As for PMing you, I tried that once, remember? I was genuinely trying to be helpful and you were hostile and threatening to me. I never did it again.
and,
Threaten away, fernsy. PLENTY of others have made the effort -- after all, how long does it take to Google something? NO ONE believes that an army of strangers has taken to the Internet to post nasty things about Tig Notaro and that they all happen to sound just like you with many of them using your real name.
As for the list, forget it. You are a very sue-happy person and my husband is trained in law. He advises me not to do it because even though anyone can Google and find the links and compare them to what you write here and reach the obvious conclusion, he doesn't want me involved in a nuisance suit. I will find and post the PM, however, but it will take a while since I have to ask management. I can no longer access my original emma peel account here, which is why I write under emma peel 2. I'll write them immediately to see if they can retrieve it. You might ask Cranky Cuss about it, since we discussed if I should send it to you or not before I sent it. You see, we were concerned about you. I told him how you responded and after that, I've had no contact with you for a long, long time until you decided to attack me out of the blue yesterday.
As for the list, forget it. You are a very sue-happy person and my husband is trained in law. He advises me not to do it because even though anyone can Google and find the links and compare them to what you write here and reach the obvious conclusion, he doesn't want me involved in a nuisance suit. I will find and post the PM, however, but it will take a while since I have to ask management. I can no longer access my original emma peel account here, which is why I write under emma peel 2. I'll write them immediately to see if they can retrieve it. You might ask Cranky Cuss about it, since we discussed if I should send it to you or not before I sent it. You see, we were concerned about you. I told him how you responded and after that, I've had no contact with you for a long, long time until you decided to attack me out of the blue yesterday.
Hmmm, Cranky Cuss? Hostile and threatening? I sure had no memory of that, and here's why:
--------------------------------------
June 10th 2010
June 10th 2010
fernsy,
I want you to know that I am very concerned about you (it's the lawyer's wife in me) and in the interests of full disclosure, I have written about my concerns to your friend Matt Paust tonight. I know that we don't have much to do with one another but I do worry that you are so vulnerable, and that by inflaming the situation here and on the Internet in general, you are going to seriously harm your chances in your civil case.
You can tell me to mind my own business, that's fine, but I just wanted you to know why I posted what I did on your blog. I cannot imagine that this constant stress is good for you. I won't tell you what to do, but will you at least consider not writing comments attacking people involved in the case, no matter how right you might be, until it's resolved?
Sincerely,
emma
I want you to know that I am very concerned about you (it's the lawyer's wife in me) and in the interests of full disclosure, I have written about my concerns to your friend Matt Paust tonight. I know that we don't have much to do with one another but I do worry that you are so vulnerable, and that by inflaming the situation here and on the Internet in general, you are going to seriously harm your chances in your civil case.
You can tell me to mind my own business, that's fine, but I just wanted you to know why I posted what I did on your blog. I cannot imagine that this constant stress is good for you. I won't tell you what to do, but will you at least consider not writing comments attacking people involved in the case, no matter how right you might be, until it's resolved?
Sincerely,
emma
fernsy to emma peel
I really don't think you are genuinely concerned but I also have never seen you as someone incapable of reasonable thought so.... I'll just take you at your word. I can't explain to you the complexities and why I have concluded that taking it to the internet is necessary. I don't have the luxury of waiting till the estimated 2 years for the resolution, as evidenced by your friend Stellaa's e-mail to jerusalem mike awhile back, and other less clear reasons.
What to say, I can't pretend to buy your concern but hey we are all free to express what we want in the ways we want. Take care.
What to say, I can't pretend to buy your concern but hey we are all free to express what we want in the ways we want. Take care.
P.S. at this time, I was writing about my case, because Stellaaa was sending emails to a jerusalem mike telling him i was a stalker. I dared defend him against her on a matter of politics and Israel, and that is how she retaliated. I didn't want to bore OS with my travails, but this mad me feel as if I had to explain the appeal that Stella was sending around. A friendly os person, stepped in, and talked how I had skeletons in my closet. She did that with pure reasons, but I just don't have real skeletons in my closet. But, I do have fake ones. I might have a bone in my closet but no skeletons. I also was told that stellaa was slandering me on facebook, by a friend of Emma's. Plus, Emma was arch enemies with Matt, so this was DUBIOUS, that she was reaching out to him out of such profound concern for I, who was his friend, and not hers. Hey, the truth is the truth, and it is sturdy. I know many of you like to get along, but do weigh in on the hostile, and threatening manner of this pm exchange. Perhaps, I am terribly clueless, and cannot see it.